<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A LIKELY STORY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youdothatvoodoo.com/2008/03/28/a-likely-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youdothatvoodoo.com/2008/03/28/a-likely-story/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on screenwriting and creativity from a UK based writer, trainer, and script editor</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.youdothatvoodoo.com/2008/03/28/a-likely-story/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youdothatvoodoo.com/2008/03/28/a-likely-story/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Paul Campbell of http://scriptuality.blogspot.com/ wrote a post to the effect that I should include the name of the author of &lt;em&gt;The Bill&lt;/em&gt; episode in question.  All very well in theory, but I didn't catch it when it flashed up, since I was engrossed in making a cuppa at that point.  However, a quick hop to www.radiotimes.com reveals that the episode was written by Chris Oulds.  Apologies Paul for the no-show of your post: I think I did something silly which let it get mistaken for spam.  Paul also queried the placement of &lt;em&gt;Holby Blue&lt;/em&gt; at the precise same time as &lt;em&gt;The Bill&lt;/em&gt;, both going out at 8pm on Thursday.  It does seem a curious strategy, and I wouldn't want to go head to head with &lt;em&gt;The Bill&lt;/em&gt;, particularly against the second part of a story that had already built up an audience the night before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Campbell of <a href="http://scriptuality.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scriptuality.blogspot.com/</a> wrote a post to the effect that I should include the name of the author of <em>The Bill</em> episode in question.  All very well in theory, but I didn&#8217;t catch it when it flashed up, since I was engrossed in making a cuppa at that point.  However, a quick hop to <a href="http://www.radiotimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.radiotimes.com</a> reveals that the episode was written by Chris Oulds.  Apologies Paul for the no-show of your post: I think I did something silly which let it get mistaken for spam.  Paul also queried the placement of <em>Holby Blue</em> at the precise same time as <em>The Bill</em>, both going out at 8pm on Thursday.  It does seem a curious strategy, and I wouldn&#8217;t want to go head to head with <em>The Bill</em>, particularly against the second part of a story that had already built up an audience the night before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griff</title>
		<link>http://www.youdothatvoodoo.com/2008/03/28/a-likely-story/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youdothatvoodoo.com/2008/03/28/a-likely-story/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Thanks Adrian!

Yes, very exciting to get my first radio sketch broadcast. All serving to demonstrate the value of persistence. I've submitted material to five open-access radio comedy schemes in the last 18 months - "Recorded for Training Purposes", "Play and Record", "Parsons &#38; Naylor", an un-named project by Angeleye Media, and finally last night's "Tilt" (which you can hear at http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbc7/listenagain/thursday/rams/2330.ram). In fact the "Tilt" sketch they used (my contribution is Gorgoth the newsreading space monster) was a rework of an earlier sketch I sent to Angeleye.

Hopefully this also means my writing has improved over that time-frame. Certainly writing regularly for live sketch shows NewsRevue (www.newsrevue.com) and The Treason Show (www.treasonshow.co.uk) over that time, and watching how sketches go down with audiences, has taught me a few things. Sketch writing isn't rocket science - keep it short, and try and have a high ratio of punchlines to setups - but it's all too easy to write something far too long with not enough jokes. As always, I guess writing is rewriting.

It's also worth sharing the other piece of advice I got given when I started at NewsRevue by one of their long-term regulars. "Write loads." Obviously this doesn't mean "send in any old rubbish". But if you send two good sketches, you're twice as likely to get a sale than if you just send one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Adrian!</p>
<p>Yes, very exciting to get my first radio sketch broadcast. All serving to demonstrate the value of persistence. I&#8217;ve submitted material to five open-access radio comedy schemes in the last 18 months - &#8220;Recorded for Training Purposes&#8221;, &#8220;Play and Record&#8221;, &#8220;Parsons &amp; Naylor&#8221;, an un-named project by Angeleye Media, and finally last night&#8217;s &#8220;Tilt&#8221; (which you can hear at <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbc7/listenagain/thursday/rams/2330.ram" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbc7/listenagain/thursday/rams/2330.ram</a>). In fact the &#8220;Tilt&#8221; sketch they used (my contribution is Gorgoth the newsreading space monster) was a rework of an earlier sketch I sent to Angeleye.</p>
<p>Hopefully this also means my writing has improved over that time-frame. Certainly writing regularly for live sketch shows NewsRevue (www.newsrevue.com) and The Treason Show (www.treasonshow.co.uk) over that time, and watching how sketches go down with audiences, has taught me a few things. Sketch writing isn&#8217;t rocket science - keep it short, and try and have a high ratio of punchlines to setups - but it&#8217;s all too easy to write something far too long with not enough jokes. As always, I guess writing is rewriting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth sharing the other piece of advice I got given when I started at NewsRevue by one of their long-term regulars. &#8220;Write loads.&#8221; Obviously this doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;send in any old rubbish&#8221;. But if you send two good sketches, you&#8217;re twice as likely to get a sale than if you just send one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
