IDIOT GLEE
It occurred to me that three of my favourite comedies of recent years end with displays of what can best be described as idiot glee. And I figured that was worth writing about. Napoleon Dynamite climaxes in a delicious scene of sincere and dismal dancing by Jon Heder as he struts his awkward stuff on behalf of his best buddy. School of Rock has a musical finale as Jack Black leads the kids in a triumphant musical showcase, with sincerity the keynote again. And you’ll not need to guess the tone of the conclusion of Little Miss Sunshine, as young actress Abigail Breslin bravely boogies through a dance routine devised by her heroin-tootin’ grandpa, with the assistance of her dysfunctional family. What is it about these displays of honest ineptness that grabs me, and is there something that can be learned, given that all three films received critical and box office success?
Part of what’s appealing is the cult of the amateur: Napoleon is a geek of some calibre, and that’s affecting compared to the polished sheen that other characters at school display in vying for success in the school elections. Not that Napoleon would compete in such a contest: but his similarly outcast Mexican friend Pedro is ambitious, and Napoleon will do anything for his amigo. In School of Rock, the kids are competing against seen-it-all rockers twice and more their age, and their energy is refreshing – more so since the performers here really are kid musicians, rather than young actors. And with Little Miss Sunshine, Abigail is up against some truly vile creations, also competing to become junior beauty pageant winners.
Hmm: three films about geeks competing against slick operators, and heart winning through (well, in Little Miss Sunshine, Abigail doesn’t capture the crown, but her performance is a moral victory that wins her family their collective mojo back, which is far more important). This is starting to look like a subgenre. Any other contenders? Jon Heder takes his routine on ice in Blades of Glory, this time in a double act where he and Will Ferrell compete against dastardly schemers to win the prize. And Dodgeball sees Vince Vaughan’s renegade team win out against corporate drones.
So, the template is clear enough. And it’s not a far remove from the standard comedy template, in truth. The competition element allows underdogs a showcase to become heroes and provides a readymade structure for the narrative, and there’s something immensely appealing about the idiot glee of naïve climactic performances that provides an emotionally satisfying conclusion to the films.
Of course, given that this is film we’re dealing with, the naivity is carefully crafted, the bumbling directed to the nth degree…but there’s still something in it that can capture the attention. And, to quote systems thinking forerunner Gregory Bateson from his awesome Steps to an Ecology of Mind: “…without these paradoxes the evolution of communication would be at an end. Life would then be an endless interchange of stylised messages, a game with rigid rules, unrelieved by change or humor.” And we wouldn’t want that, would we?
MTG said,
December 31, 2007 @ 1:47 pm
When an intention meets an obstacle; it’s called drama… or comedy… or tragedy… or something.
When a square peg tries to fit a round hole; you have the human encounter with culture. The secret is that almost everyone is (or feels like) a square peg in some domain or other.
The rest of the equation is: “Are you happy with your lot?”
And there you have it:
Square pegs wanting to fit round holes; unhappy with lot.
Square pegs not wanting to fit round holes; happy with lot.
Round pegs not wanting to be seen to be square; happy with lot but afraid
Round pegs wanting to be square; uhappy with lot.
“What is it about these displays of honest ineptness that grabs me”
You’re human.
“and is there something that can be learned, given that all three films received critical and box office success?”
The Outsider is a perpetual character; we are all outsiders.
Anything that keeps the aspiring but weird hopeful, will sell.
Great first blog… keep writing…
Paul Watson said,
December 31, 2007 @ 2:02 pm
Your RSS feed is now in my daily reads - good to see you online
Philip Palmer said,
December 31, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
As a geek, I love this subgenre…BACK TO THE FUTURE would be a much greater film if the nerdy guy with glasses got to travel back in time, not the cool skateboarder.
I love MTG’s square hole/round hole thesis…
Cat Vincent said,
January 1, 2008 @ 12:56 am
Interesting points - for me, the archetype of these movies comes way earlier, with the likes of Revenge of the Nerds and the first half of Stripes.
MTG - great summation of all drama and human endeavour! Are you using Outsider in the Colin Wilson sense (as it seems from my admittedly blurry memories of binging on CW in my teens)?
Adrian said,
January 1, 2008 @ 5:13 pm
Cat –
you may be right that the genesis of these films is before my own awareness of them; I’ll keep an eye out for the ones you’ve mentioned.
– Adrian
Cat Vincent said,
January 1, 2008 @ 7:56 pm
Just showing my age!!